- #Google live photo to gif for free
- #Google live photo to gif how to
- #Google live photo to gif plus
- #Google live photo to gif free
#Google live photo to gif free
It’s worth mentioning that if you just want to make animated gifs from still pictures or videos, GifMill works great for that purpose as well, which is another free app for iOS we’ve discussed before. Nonetheless, for a free offering, GIF Toaster gets the job done well, and can also convert video to animated gifs as well. * GIF Toaster works well but has some limitations and some quirks in the user interface, so while it’s great for limited usage, if you plan on converting many Live Photos to animated gifs, you may want to try some other apps for Live Photo conversions, and the $2 Live GIF app or $2 Lively app are perhaps better choices. Very easy, here’s a Live Photo converted into an animated GIF of a fireplace that was created with the app.
#Google live photo to gif for free
#Google live photo to gif how to
How to Convert a Live Photo to Animated GIF on iPhone with GIF Toaster And technically the still image is higher res whereas the video is lower res (with video+image the image is generally a still frame so res tends to be the same).Before getting started, take any Live Photo with the iPhone camera that you want to convert if you haven’t done so already (you’ll need to enable the Live Photo feature if you turned it off).
#Google live photo to gif plus
Also of course iOS doesn't support WebM and HTML5 video on iOS is not intended to be used for anything other than full-screen videos because Apple knows best and actually supporting HTML5 media properly would ruin performance (as would supporting WebM without the same optimisations Apple made for H.264).Īlso of course Live Photos are totally different because they're from Apple, not based on any of those cruddy and boring "open standards".īut to be serious for a moment: the main difference is that iOS treats them as a thing (unlike a plain "video plus image" combo), so the entire user experience surrounding them is different from recording to sharing them. Not sure why you want to crucify them over that.Īh, you see, a HTML5 video tag with a webm and `poster` image doesn't have the blurry transition when switching between the still image and the video as well as when looping the video. Apple released a small bit of code, for anyone to use on their own website, to do the job of drawing the UI and transitioning between the photo and video of course, this is implemented on top of open web standards. In theory, the idea of treating a photo-video pair like a photo could be standardized, but it's not any less standard than gifv, and at least when it comes to display on websites (as opposed to, e.g., photo gallery apps), it's a simple enough concept that there doesn't seem to be much benefit in standardization. (The actual photo and video are just JPG and MP4, respectively.) Live Photos combine a high-resolution photo with a lower-quality video, and the video doesn't play until you mouse over. "Live Photos" is a broadly similar concept to "gifv", in the sense that both are basically just a proprietary brand for a basic UI on top of a video player, not anything with deep technical content. The Google’s app analyzes the Live Photos and performs its expert stuff very quickly and gives you looping GIFz or movies which can be shared right away. When it's done, you'll be greeted by your GIF, where you can easily share it using the share button at the bottom of the screen. Select 'Animation' from this menu, then wait a few moments while your GIF is created. You can only watch "gifv" on imgur, though of course any site can play a looping silent video. Google’s video stabilization expertise that they have build upon the biggest video sharing platform YouTube, are now being used to make these animations from Live Photos on iOS. Step 3: Create Your GIF With your pictures selected, tap the + button at the top of the screen, then a menu will emerge. "gifv" is not a standard or even a format it's just what imgur puts in their URLs for pages that play looping silent videos, simulating the GIF experience. > What is this even supposed to be beyond webm/gifv anyways?
This new 'feature' is just another example of that. > My point is that Apple repeatedly resists open web standards for the sake of maintaining their walled garden.
The two things you cited are completely unrelated.Įdit: the parent replied to me but deleted their post by the time I finished my response since I spent the time to write it, I guess I'll put it here:
0 kommentar(er)
